|A to Z of |
| Previous Technique|
| Next Technique|
Improved Nominal Group Technique
There are two implementation checklists presented here, the first by VanGundy and the 2nd by Isaksen, Dorval and Treffinger. Each has subtle differences in their perspectives.
Implementation Checklist 1 ( VanGundy, 1988)
- Resources are the resources (time, personnel, equipment, money, information) sufficient for executing this idea?
- Motivation, are there others with equal motivation and commitment required for successful implementation?
- Resistance, is the idea likely to come across any ‘closed thinking’ and/or resistance to change in general?
- Procedures, are there any procedural complications to get over
- Structures, are there any structural obstacles to surmount (e.g. bad communication channels)?
- Policies, What official/unofficial policies need to be overcome?
- Risk, will risk taking be tolerated by those responsible for implementation and if so to what level?
- Power, do any power struggles exist relating to the idea that might obstruct implementation?
- Clashes, are there any clashes of personalities that may hinder advancement in the implementation?
- Climate, is the organisational environment one of teamwork and co-operation or suspicion and distrust?
Implementation checklist 2 (Isaken, Dorval and Treffinger, 1994)
- Relative advantage
- Will the plan obviously progress what is currently in place?
- What are the advantages/benefits in accommodating it?
- Who will gain from it?
- How will implementing it reward others or me?
- How can you promote its benefits to all?
- Is it consistent with current practice/thinking?
- Can it be demonstrated to meet a particular groups requirement?
- Is it a better course of action to an existing shared goal
- What group(s) would support it, its objectives and actions?
- Can it be named/put together more constructively
- Is it straightforward to understand?
- Can it be clearly translated to different people?
- Does it take long to communicate to others?
- How might it be illuminated, made simpler, easier to understand?
- Can I demonstrate the new idea/object effortlessly?
- How can you reduce ambiguity concerning the ideas new elements?
- How can the adopter try out section, before deciding to use it all?
- How can you persuade adopters to try part of it?
- Should it require full adoption, but partial trials are insisted upon, what then?
- How can you alter it to make it more simplistic for trial?
- How easy is it for an adopter to locate/acquire it? Is it visible?
- Can it be made more visible? How?
- Is it possible to make it easier to understand?
- Can it be better communicated?
- Are there reasons for not making it visible now?
- Other questions to help gain acceptance for you Plan
- What other resources could help? How best to use them?
- What important obstructions are there? How can they be surmounted?
- How to deal with challenges/opportunities it creates?
- What might initiate action? … and the next steps?
- How to build feedback into it to allow for potential improvements?